The CONTOO Portal       Congress Administration       Personal Account       Login/Logout       Privacy       Contact           
Invited Speaker

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin ring machine

Arthur Horwich1, Dan Clare2, Joel Quispe3, Scott Stagg4, Daven Vasishtan5, Maya Topf6, George Farr7, Navneet Tyagi8, Ashok Deniz9, Wayne Fenton10, Helen Saibil11
1 Yale School of Medicine/HHMI and Scripps Res Inst
2 Inst Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College
3 Scripps Res. Institute
4 Scripps Res. Institute
5 Inst Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College
6 Inst Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College
7 Yale School of Medicine/HHMI
8 Yale School of Medicine/HHMI
9 Scripps Res. Institute
10 Yale School of Medicine
11 Inst Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College

Abstract

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin machine provides ATP-mediated kinetic assistance to folding to the native state of a large number of substrate proteins. In ongoing studies, we have been addressing the nature of the action of ATP, the trigger to the activation of folding, employing cryoEM studies of an ATP hydrolysis-defective (D398A) version of GroEL. An apparent sequence of conformational states has been observed that chart a trajectory of movements that are associated with polypeptide binding (to early states) followed by potential stretching (by a later-formed one), the last-formed state poised for docking of the cochaperonin ring, GroES. Because polypeptide remains bound to the apical domains at the point of such docking, this ensures that it does not escape during the encapsulation process. The step of GroES docking is followed by further large rigid body apical domain movements that eject substrate protein from the cavity wall into the domed chamber where folding ensues. We have continued to investigate whether the electrostatically rich chamber wall takes an active vs. passive role in the folding process.

DOI®: 10.3288/contoo.paper.1389
Please_wait